American Men's Grand Slam Drought Isn't Fritz's Responsibility to Carry
I have a few thoughts regarding that comments made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was understandable. Rather, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at the majors: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.
Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the top three competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?
Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories
The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite delivery and concussive strength on both front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his potential.
The American has made a several significant, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.
The American star made a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.
Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued break point after break point, extending the streak to the point of agony. When he finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Down match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.
The match was quite ironclad evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is those who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.
The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just express his emotions or the strategy he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)
Year-End Championships: Singles Groups
American legend Division
- The Spanish phenom
- The American contender
- Alex de Minaur (Aus)
- The Italian stylist
Bjorn Borg Group
- Jannik Sinner (It)
- Alexander Zverev (Ger)
- The rising American
- The Canadian talent
“I’d probably think about it forever if I fail to do it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {